
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Tighter and More Violent?

Sunday, April 22, 2007
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Second Amendment!

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
- How do you interpret the 2nd amendment?
- What are the two interpretations the courts are struggling with?
- Who are gun laws aimed at?
- If Virginia Tech had lifted its ban on guns on campus could this catastrophe have been avoided?
Friday, April 13, 2007
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
US Citzen again?

Are all
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
5th Amendment to
In times of war are these actions legal? Forgivable? Desirable?
http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/speeches/2005/ag_speech_051122.html
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-usa-padilla.html
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Stopping Drugs Use at What Price?

Do parents have the right to control the behavior of their students? Do families have “family privacy” rights?
For this post it would be great if you could actually do some research on “family privacy”.
Should schools test students for drugs? Why might schools want to get involved in weekend illegal behavior of students?
What might be an economic push behind this increase of drug testing?
Thursday, March 22, 2007
Online Constitutional Rights

Federal courts have struck down an opportunity to regulate the Internet. How is this a first amendment issue? Does regulation need to occur? Can we prosecute parents,online providers, or web-hosting sites,web authors for not filtering?
NYTIMES ARTICLE
The 84 page decision.
Link to Brown's other site www.monticohort1.blogspot.com
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Utah's Afterschool Club Laws

Sunday, March 18, 2007
Olympic Torch and the First Amendment

We will :
- 1. pass out the laptop computers; (notice I used a semi-colon)
- 2. then we will log onto www.qhst-seniors.blogspot.com;
- 3. Then we will read the NY Times Article linked here together;
- 4. We will of course share our thoughts in a disscussion;
- 5. Then on our own we will read another linked article and post a comment.
Education Week
The incident
On Jan. 24, 2002, Joe Frederick, 18, unfurled a banner near Juneau-Douglas High School proclaiming "Bong Hits 4 Jesus." School principal Deborah Morse took the banner, which officials said promoted marijuana use, and suspended him. He appealed, then took his case to federal court, saying his constitutional rights had been violated.
The case
Judge backed the school district in 2003. Last year, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed and found that Frederick had a right to display his banner, "however vague and nonsensical." The school district appealed.
The issues
1. Can school officials punish student speech of this kind when it occurs off-campus during a semi-official school event? Officials say it undermined their anti-drug mission. Frederick's lawyers said it was not "disruptive" or "plainly offensive," two key tests set by the Supreme Court in the past.
2. Can the principal be held liable personally -- with monetary damages -- for violating the student's rights?
The lawyers
For Frederick: Juneau lawyer Douglas Mertz, with support from the American Civil Liberties Union.
For the Juneau school district: Kenneth Starr, the former independent prosecutor whose Monica Lewinsky investigation led to the impeachment trial of President Clinton.
Friday, March 16, 2007
Legalizing Marijuana

How did the fact sheets help you discuss the article from the NY Times better?
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Principal's Monologue

Re “ ‘Monologues’ Spurs Dialogue on Taste and Speech” (news article, March 8):
The controversy over the word “vagina” and its use in a reading by high school students of a selection from “The Vagina Monologues” calls to mind the current widespread censorship of the “The Higher Power of Lucky,” a Newbery Medal-winning children’s book, for its use of the word “scrotum.”
I understand the impulse that parents and school authorities have to “protect” children. As a parent, I certainly wish I could keep my son young and innocent for as long as possible, especially now when children are forced to grow up and confront adult issues and matters much earlier than before.
Still, if we, as adults, put forward the correct words for our body parts for even the youngest children, that may help lessen the use of the much more vulgar slang terms kids are more apt to use.
If we used the correct terminology to demystify and talk about our bodies, that could help defuse our hypersexualized society, which is much more harmful to our children than any particular anatomical term.
Beth Kneller Brooklyn, March 8, 2007
•
To the Editor:
The events leading to the suspension of three high school girls for saying the word “vagina” in a reading from a play that a New York Times reviewer called “probably the most important piece of political theater of the last decade” are beyond appalling.
Let’s be clear about this. This is not about insubordination, but about heavy-handed censorship. Whether the girls did (or, as they maintain, did not) agree to avoid the word, the principal’s actions before and after the reading were unconscionable.
Publishers take prior restraint very seriously, and when that prior restraint is to prevent the utterance of a medically correct term for a female body part, we say, “Enough!”
We would be delighted to send the principal some excellent books about free speech — including the First Amendment rights of students — as well as books on human anatomy, all published by our members.
Pat Schroeder Washington, March 9, 2007
•
To the Editor:
A few weeks ago it was “scrotum” that was causing an uproar in the world of children’s librarians. Now, in Westchester County, 16-year-old girls face punishment for uttering the word “vagina” when told not to.
Perhaps this culture’s sad hang-ups over sex can be traced to its refusal to call a penis a penis, a scrotum a scrotum, a vagina a vagina.
And perhaps other problems can similarly be linked to its fear of plain speaking, whereby failure is “success that hasn’t occurred yet,” catastrophe is “a heckuva job” and a lie is a “plan for victory.”
Too many adults are in deep denial. Maybe listening to our children isn’t such a bad idea.
Mark Hussey
Thursday, March 08, 2007
Why are Veterans Being Ignored?

Wednesday, March 07, 2007
Homeless Heros
Monday, March 05, 2007
Death to Some

Why should the same crime receive the death penalty in one town and not another?
What is the authors opoinion on the death penalty?Where in the US Constitution is the death penalty a means afforded to the state?
Do people who commit horrible crimes deserve to die? Should the U.S. keep the death penalty?
The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says:
“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”
The Eighth Amendment protects the rights of Americans after they have been convicted of a crime.
It protects people from cruel and unusual punishment. Cruel and unusual punishment means a really horrible punishment like torture. It also means a punishment that does not fit the crime.
The Eighth Amendment makes sure that you do not go to jail for jay walking. It also makes sure that you do not go to prison for life for stealing a little money.
Is the death penalty a cruel and unusual punishment? Some people think so and they believe that the Constitution forbids it.
- According to the Eighth Amendment, what is a cruel and unusual punishment?
- Why do some people think the death penalty is a good idea?
- Why do some people think the death penalty is a bad idea?
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Do we have a right to "marraige"?
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
"N-Word"
After reading the article form the NYTIMES with our class today many different opinions came forward. What was something from our conversation you remember? Should the language in the Bill of Rights be updated? Why/ Why not?
PS. please read the US Constitution?
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Legally Responsible

Should schools be held legally responsible for the actions of the bullies they house? Should the Supreme Court Justices be able to dictate laws from the bench? How does our school deal with issues of bullying? According the article we read today in class and in the spirit of Acceptance Week please share you views on harassment in school by students and how this should be dealt with.
PS. if you have time read this ----> click here
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
New Recruits

Should the US Military Recruiters be more selective when choosing memebrs to train for combat?
NYTIMES Article
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Penumbra Rights, Merck, and Texas Pre-teens

Should the government mandate the use of Gardasil
( to prevent HPV) in school-age girls?
CSMontior article 2/13/07
NYTIMES Article 2/03/07
Merck homepage
Gardasil information
Updtaed Atricle from Saturday 17th
EXTRA CREDIT
If you get a chance please post a response to this blog. ----> here
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
The Truth

Lots of information.... How has your view of AL Gore changed because of this movie? What is the former VP telling us in this movie? What can be done? What are we to do now that we know of the "Inconvenient Truth"?
PS ..... This is the other blog I was talking about in class. After leaving your comment here about the in class movie click on the hyperlink and post a second comment on Mr. Tesler's blog. For bonus points click and post a comment here.




